Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Bret Baier: For or Against the Environment?

        Baier is a “journalist” for the Fox “News” Corporation. He hosts the Special Report, and it sure is special all right. Bret Baier, along with every other “news” anchor at Fox, is involved in a campaign to misinform their viewers about global warming and climate change. For years they have said that the Earth is not warming, but they go even further than that and say that the Earth is actually cooling. Through misuse of sources they fool their viewers into believing whatever the dirty money in their pockets tells them to say.
        Bret Baier believes that the Earth is not warming, but cooling, contrary to what nearly every scientist who actually has the data and the expertise to render judgment on the topic. Environmental issues are dismissed by every Fox employee as the liberal-elite-media and scientists trying to control your lives, when in reality Fox is controlling people by giving them deliberate misinformation. Is Bret Baier attempting to help the environment and the problems it faces in a world where most people don’t give a second thought to any needs but their own? No. Bret Baier is the epitome of the problem, that the environment is fine on its own, it doesn’t need our help, nothing is wrong with it.
        This type of thinking is very short sighted; we can only let so much polar ice melt before our coastal cities are flooded. At that point there won’t be very much we can do, there will be too much carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide trapping the suns rays for us to get rid of, CO and CO2 are very difficult to get out of the atmosphere in large quantities. Thinking for the long term would cause Bret to tell people that conserving resources and reducing pollution is the only way to sustain our way of life. If the planet dies, we die with it.
        Baier and the rest of Fox aren’t considering all the effects that a diseased planet will have on our health. With more carbon mono- and dioxide in the air, our lung health will deteriorate. Has anyone considered that at a certain point, breathing conditions will be so poor that sports records will never be broken again. Athletes won’t be able to get enough oxygen to use their muscles to their fullest extent. What then will the neanderthals at Fox have to do on Sundays besides attempt to host meaningful discussions about what really matters. By giving environmental stresses and science as a whole the middle finger, Bret Baier and Fox News have made nearly half of America distrust science and loath environmental protection. There are no benefits to doing this if you live in the real world, there are only costs. But when you live in a world where you'll say anything to get money from companies that kill the environment for profit, there can only be benefits in what you say, never a cost, never a penalty. Bret Baier is incredibly selfish, incredibly naive, and entirely a puppet owned by the big oil companies and others who have a stake in low environmental regulation. Who needs air when you've got all this money?


Sources:



Sunday, September 16, 2012

Cornucopia vs. Cassandra

            Since the population of the earth began to increase exponentially since the start of the industrial revolution, human beings have wondered whether or not there would be enough resources to sustain our existence. There are now two major viewpoints we have rallied around: the earth will run out of resources eventually, or the earth can sustain our growing population forever. These opinions are classified as cornucopia or cassandra. Cornucopia, as the name suggests, is the belief that the earth will always have enough resources to provide for humanity and the rest of nature. Cassandra conversely is the theory that our population will get so large that at some point the earth’s resources will be depleted. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, but you have to be able to back it up.
            In Greek mythology, the cornucopia was a magical horn that would magically and endlessly refill itself with food and drink. Today’s cornucopian believes that man’s advances in science and technology will allow us to engineer enough resources to ensure the survival of the human race, no matter how large it becomes. This is just an unsustainable viewpoint. We cannot create something from nothing, we would need to find these resources somewhere in the universe in order for us to take advantage of them. Technology will not be able to increase at the rate necessary for deep space long-term travel before the earth runs dry. America on the whole seems to share this opinion, because we use more goods than almost any other nation on this earth. We aren’t even the most populous country, why do we have permission to destroy the earth faster than anyone else? We view the environment as future-America’s problem, but if we can’t see it as now-America’s problem, future-America is going to be overwhelmed. Cornucopian's are thinking short term issues will be solved by technology in time.
            Cassandra’s have a much more realistic outlook on life and how it will be affected by the lack of resources available. We, yes I am a Cassandra, see the world as being a place inadequate to support the amount of humans here right now, let alone how many will be here in twenty years or so. China is seeing the world this way. They are now attempting to get rid of all the pollution in their atmosphere to make the world a better place for their future generations. The only problem here is that China cannot yet innovate very well. They can clone any existing industry nearly perfectly, but making one from scratch is difficult. China normally copies what we do, seeing as we are always innovating and making things better. Sadly America does not see the world as finite; therefore we do not have a large industry in place for caring for the environment. The largest country on earth can’t get good enough blueprints from us, so they have not yet been able to attempt to fix their environmental issues. We are thinking of the long term affects we will experience from overuse of the earth, cornucopian's are not in the slightest. Cassandra’s are stifled by not only the Cornucopian’s, but also by the conditions that ideology has created. 
            We all know what the earth looks like, all those famous blue marble pictures from the moon. Now imagine if that marble’s green patches all started to look brown and gray, lifeless and empty. And at the same time the oceans are getting darker, filled with pollution. Not a very nice image is it? Well it’s what’s going to happen eventually if we as a species cannot control our intake of limited resources. Our technological advancements will slow down the decay of the earth, but it is impossible for it to be stopped. We have to find a long-term solution right now, or our future generations will be cursed to live with our mistakes. And it's not just them, we are harming everything on this planet. Dogs, trees, cats, monkeys, humans, apples, dolphins, rats, germs, roses, and every other type of flora and fauna now has a decreased lifespan, species-wise, thanks to our misuse of the earth. Congrats.

References:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/23/AR2008052302456.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/opinion/19friedman.html
http://andrewsidea.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/walle1.png
http://www.sane.org.za/docs/views/showviews.asp?ID=115
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2011/10/cornucopians-vs-malthusians.html